tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22299114.post1111667368899878111..comments2024-02-24T02:05:04.116-05:00Comments on New York Divorce and Family Law Blog: Error to Decide Custody Without Forensic Report Where Conflicting TestimonyJoel R. Brandeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00071300360715546038noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22299114.post-59795522897609940132008-10-19T11:17:00.000-04:002008-10-19T11:17:00.000-04:00Your comment is incorrect!The Judge did do his jo...Your comment is incorrect!<BR/><BR/>The Judge did do his job as he saw best. Judge said number of times that the forensic would be the "courts witness" and that both will not be paying the forensic plus Judge gave the forensic planty time to show up in court even after 4 direct orders from the court and put of the trial for a month , basicly the forensic wanted to extort more fee's from the partys as he did during the evaluations stopping it for additional fee's "Not as the original Court Order stated" forensic had no right to stop his work because of fee's. The law gaurdian has lied to the Appellate Court/Judges that the father had not put the children to school which in fact the father did the law gaurdian was just neverdid his job to check with the school it seem that he was favoring the mother from his conduct with regards to this case. It was proven in multiple courts that the mother has "no credibility" as to her baseless/false aligations of lieing to and putting up the children to lie about their father a case of "Peranting Alianation"<BR/>Now that Lobel has given his testimony the proof was in his notes which the court ordered him to turn over that he favored the mothers side by switching the test results as to make the father look as he had number of problems <BR/>in fact it was the mothers test results (that Lobel covered up) showed she had number of mental issues.<BR/>Its a real shame that a law gaurdian is not doing his job.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com