In Souratgar v Fair, 2016 WL 1168733 (2d
Cir., 2016) the Second Circuit reversed a judgment ordering Respondent Lee Jen
Fair to pay to the prevailing petitioner-appellee, Abdollah Naghash Souratgar,
$283,066.62 in expenses under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act,
which directs district courts to issue such an order “unless the respondent
establishes that such order would be clearly inappropriate.” 22 U.S.C. §
9007(b)(3). It held that the determination requires district courts to
weigh relevant equitable factors, including intimate partner violence. Having
reviewed all relevant equitable factors, it concluded that, because the
respondent showed that the petitioner engaged in multiple, unilateral acts of
intimate partner violence against her and that her removal of the child from
the habitual country was related to that violence, and because there were no
countervailing factors in the record in favor of the petitioner, such an award
would be “clearly inappropriate.”
The definitive site on the web for New York Divorce and Family law.
Search This Blog
Monday, May 23, 2016
Court of Appeals Construes "Extended Disruption of Custody", in Domestic Relations Law § 72 (2), in Favor of Grandparents finding they have Standing to Seek Custody
In
Suarez v Williams, --- N.E.3d ----, 2015 WL 8788195 (N.Y.), 2015 N.Y. Slip Op.
09231, the Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Leslie Stein, held that
grandparents may demonstrate standing to seek custody, pursuant to
Domestic Relations Law § 72 (2) and the Court’s decision in Matter of Bennett v
Jeffreys (40 NY2d 543 [1976]) based on extraordinary circumstances where
the child has lived with the grandparents for a prolonged period of time, even
if the child had contact with, and spent time with, a parent while the child
lived with the grandparents. In addition, a parent need not relinquish all care
and control of the child. Even if the parent exercises some control over the
child, for example during visitation, a parent may still, as a general matter,
have voluntarily relinquished care and control of the child to the grandparent
to the extent that the grandparent is, in essence, acting as a parent with
primary physical custody.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)