Search This Blog

New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook

The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook by Joel R. Brandes is available online in the print edition at the Bookbaby Bookstore and other bookstores. It is now available in Kindle ebook editions and epub ebook editions in our website bookstore. It is also available at Amazon Kindle, Barnes & Noble and Goodreads.

The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook was reviewed in the New York Law Journal. Click here to read the review.

The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook was also reviewed in Readers Favorite Book Reviews. Click here for that review.

The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook was written for both the attorney who has never tried a matrimonial action and for the experienced litigator. It is a “how to” book for lawyers. This 836 page handbook focuses on the procedural and substantive law, as well as the law of evidence, that an attorney must have at his or her fingertips when trying a matrimonial action. It is intended to be an aid for preparing for a trial and as a reference for the procedure in offering and objecting to evidence during a trial. The handbook deals extensively with the testimonial and documentary evidence necessary to meet the burden of proof. There are thousands of suggested questions for the examination of witnesses at trial to establish each cause of action and requests for ancillary relief, as well as for the cross-examination of difficult witnesses. Table of Contents

Saturday, August 23, 2008

CPLR 5241 Amended. New Proceeding No Longer Necessary to Assert Mistake of Fact

Until now, New York law required that where an income execution is served on a debtor, the debtor had 15 days to reply and, where the income execution contained an error as defined in CPLR 5241(a)(8), to bring a petition under CPLR Article 4 for mistake of fact. The CPLR Advisory Committee believed that it should not be necessary that a new proceeding be brought to challenge an error in an income execution and recommended removal of the burden of commencing a new, separate, enforcement proceeding, together with payment of a new index number fee and fee for a request for judicial intervention, solely to correct the error. The last sentence in CPLR 5241(e) was amended to require that, in actions to enforce a money judgment, applications to assert a mistake of fact in Supreme Court be made by order to show cause or motion on notice to the creditor in the same action in which the order or judgment sought to be enforced was entered. This petition is in aid of a court order, i.e., either a Supreme Court order in a matrimonial proceeding or a Family Court order in a support proceeding. Laws of 2008, Ch 94, effective May 27, 2008.

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:52 PM

    A man discharged from service after serving in Viet Nam with Ptsd since that time. Never had any earning capacity. Lived under poverty line since then, had 2 children in the 80's and Support now says he owes $85,000.00 in arrears. He owns nothing,earns nothing, is 65 with heart condition. Recourse??

    ReplyDelete
  2. sandie10:24 PM

    I have the same(almost)situation. My husbands ex wife came out of the woodwork after HER children are adults and paased them off as my husbands offspring. And she won a $80,000 judgement for arrears. Leaving my home to go to foreclosure because of his ex wife!Then I had to file bankruptcy to try and save my home. My husband & I have 3 children, 2 of whom are disabled. Now our, namely HIS real biological minor children are made to suffer and in jeopardy of living in the street. While his ex wife gets monies garnished from my husbands paycheck and sits ina bar and drinks it up week after week

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:50 PM

    I want not approve on it. I assume precise post. Specially the title attracted me to review the intact story.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:53 PM

    Good post and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you seeking your information.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:29 PM

    Opulently I acquiesce in but I think the collection should secure more info then it has.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:32 AM

    Opulently I agree but I think the list inform should secure more info then it has.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:16 AM

    Good day!
    Just found this site and thought it might be useful to chat to people who are trying to accomplish the same as me!

    I spend too much of my life on the internet and look forward to chatting to you all and picking up and sharing ideas along the way!


    Peace out.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous1:30 AM

    Good day!

    The good vibe for everybody.
    Problems of health blogging me at home (for the moment) I take of come here, participate a little good grow has all !

    Take care, Dennis from [url=http://www.myonlinepayday.com]My Online Payday[/url] website!

    ReplyDelete